Sygil
Profile Options
#101
0
Homosexual, this is my final response to you because you have terrible reading skills. I thought my sentence structure and word usage was deliberate enough to leave little room for misinterpretation of the meaning of my post. Obviously not, so I'll use simpler words and shorter sentences for you.
In summary, your life style is not the problem. You claim NOT to throw your life style in people's faces. Your name throws it in people's faces. Going off of that, I said, people COULD assume you were a zealous homosexual. I didn't accuse you of being one. But, that is the first impression EVERYONE would get from your forum name alone.
It's strange social etiquette that you want everyone's first impression of you to be -homosexual-. Why can't you be a PERSON first and have a forum name that identifies you? Instead, you throw your life style out as your identity. Poor form.
You should be a person with a name first. Then, your life style is a part of who you are. I don't know how to say that any simpler.
In summary, your life style is not the problem. You claim NOT to throw your life style in people's faces. Your name throws it in people's faces. Going off of that, I said, people COULD assume you were a zealous homosexual. I didn't accuse you of being one. But, that is the first impression EVERYONE would get from your forum name alone.
It's strange social etiquette that you want everyone's first impression of you to be -homosexual-. Why can't you be a PERSON first and have a forum name that identifies you? Instead, you throw your life style out as your identity. Poor form.
You should be a person with a name first. Then, your life style is a part of who you are. I don't know how to say that any simpler.