BarkaBarka
Profile Options
#11
0
0
0
0
I really hope EME isn't as stupid as they have already shown to be
0
Suroh on 03/29/2012, 10:11 AMSo ah I see nothing new here. What I do see is people who hear a brief summary of some thing from a friend of theirs ( who didn't know what he/she was talking about ) and is now bothered by it lol. Go to the source and stop listening to other players we don't always have the right information. You did how ever forget to mention the vanarach position can be taken by force so it's only half of a popularity contest. And these people will affect our game play on a major scale so electing some one you like wont always turn out to be a good thing, it will take some time but people will learn this the hard way:) So once again none of the information you posted here is new news :D
Force is reliant on battlegrounds, which we won't have. The first 'election' will most certainly be a popularity contest.
0
Well I hope they do not implement the Vanarch system until they put the BG version in. Otherwise this game will be completely unfair for the smaller guilds.
I don't want to hear the BS of say, "Well join a large guild then". The game was designed for both voting system and BG system (As much as I hate the BG system, it's in and it should be in when the voting system goes live).
I really hope EME isn't as stupid as they have already shown to be and does not turn the voting feature on until the BG's go in as well.
0
I am actually against Vanarchs being guild leaders only as well.
0
0
0
Well I hope they do not implement the Vanarch system until they put the BG version in. Otherwise this game will be completely unfair for the smaller guilds.
I don't want to hear the BS of say, "Well join a large guild then". The game was designed for both voting system and BG system (As much as I hate the BG system, it's in and it should be in when the voting system goes live).
I really hope EME isn't as stupid as they have already shown to be and does not turn the voting feature on until the BG's go in as well.
0