Shift21
Profile Options
#1
0
Frogster now officially tells us the changes were made because of a personal issues with content, by both EME and Frogster.
Personal issues with content. Really?
The only argument people have has for the changes was that it needed to be done to appease certain groups. That EME never did it out of personal interest.
That has been completely debunked.
You can agree with their logic behind the changes, butthat does not change the fact they are changing aspects of the game based purely off their personal desires.
This not their game. They are a publisher. They should not be pushing their personal views on the developers under any circumstances.
Whats next? Is some high ranking official at EME going to decide that he thinks X is wrong with the game and force balance changes on them?
Frogster on 04/25/2012, 08:19 AM
So you are protecting the fictional children in a mythical game, from what exactly?
Did you honestly think having Mythical beings showing their belly buttons was going to drive people to pedophilia?
I would argue anyone that considers that possibility are the ones looking at Elin as children, and they themselves the ones with some serious issues.
Normal people view them as a cute creature, not as a sexual object.
Remove panties from the equation, what if it wasnt armor they had moral issues with, what if it was Baraka?
What if they removed Baraka for some weird personal issues.
What if they had some weird problem with horses. And they removed mounts from the game.
Sure its illogical, but you cant see past panties and are clouding the issue. It has NOTHING to do with panties.
Source:
http://tera-europe.com/newsdetail/article/tera-letter-to-the-community.html
Personal issues with content. Really?
The only argument people have has for the changes was that it needed to be done to appease certain groups. That EME never did it out of personal interest.
That has been completely debunked.
You can agree with their logic behind the changes, butthat does not change the fact they are changing aspects of the game based purely off their personal desires.
This not their game. They are a publisher. They should not be pushing their personal views on the developers under any circumstances.
Whats next? Is some high ranking official at EME going to decide that he thinks X is wrong with the game and force balance changes on them?
Frogster on 04/25/2012, 08:19 AM
We are sure you all agree that this effort for child protection was the right thing to do.
So you are protecting the fictional children in a mythical game, from what exactly?
Did you honestly think having Mythical beings showing their belly buttons was going to drive people to pedophilia?
I would argue anyone that considers that possibility are the ones looking at Elin as children, and they themselves the ones with some serious issues.
Normal people view them as a cute creature, not as a sexual object.
Remove panties from the equation, what if it wasnt armor they had moral issues with, what if it was Baraka?
What if they removed Baraka for some weird personal issues.
What if they had some weird problem with horses. And they removed mounts from the game.
Sure its illogical, but you cant see past panties and are clouding the issue. It has NOTHING to do with panties.
Source:
http://tera-europe.com/newsdetail/article/tera-letter-to-the-community.html
Edited by: Shift21
about 1 year ago