Nasher
Profile Options
#1
0
Hello everybody, I rarely post anything on this forum because I don't know English and will just generate flame and lack of respect but by what comes to be posted here is something that I believe should be considered to deserves at least a complaint. Several guilds / members have complained about the fact that other guilds have used a exploit or bug, or something else to benefit them in game and winning vanarch by war, this is a bug? It's exploit?
Obviously not, get in and leave guild is not a bug, much less exploit, try to know what each means before making accusations.
Claiming the moral was somehow affected because new guilds was used to win something is complicated.If the game allows it, how someone was harmed? If anyone is guilty of such errors or something like that is the company itself would have to assess situations and predict probable consequences like that, proving that is passed almost clean to American servers, showing that the irresponsibility and lack of conjecture damaged the company's own game and will benefit some people, because some will lose points and not others because the rule did not prohibit acceptance of vanarch and now want the opposite just because of the flames and complaints from some people. Harming others by a prior rule, where in the law itself is not allowed - the act before the ban.
If the game would be more correct as everyone wants, then we should punish or change something for everyone to start in a situation as equals, showing a lack of impartiality of the company, trying to please some and putting others at a different level, when who dictates the rules of the game is the company itself and when the rule set out nothing was forbidden.
For those who do not understand what I say, I'll give an example. Analyzing my guild and my fallows, I shall quote Bloodline, hated by some and loved by others.The Bloodline have been trading points (remembering that many guilds do this too) with the guild Tsunami to win the vanarch war. Many people complained about this situation in several ways. Many people complained about this situation in several ways, asking for a permanent ban and other several punishments for the guild. The point is that Bloodline did nothing against the rules because they were never written proving the dishonesty of the guild.
After several complaints from some players and others who exercise a certain influence inside the game, the "En Masse" decided to create new rules prohibiting the "instant entry" of "guild members", also saying that anyone who used to die helping allies guilds would have their points reset, but before the event happens there was no such rule.
So why now I will be punished? I can kill my character and let die if I want, I go where I want and leave when I want
but now I have limits to please some of the players, even with several others do not like it.
The En Masse once again proves his "impartiality" punishing ones and not others, no matter how it was done.
Obviously not, get in and leave guild is not a bug, much less exploit, try to know what each means before making accusations.
Claiming the moral was somehow affected because new guilds was used to win something is complicated.If the game allows it, how someone was harmed? If anyone is guilty of such errors or something like that is the company itself would have to assess situations and predict probable consequences like that, proving that is passed almost clean to American servers, showing that the irresponsibility and lack of conjecture damaged the company's own game and will benefit some people, because some will lose points and not others because the rule did not prohibit acceptance of vanarch and now want the opposite just because of the flames and complaints from some people. Harming others by a prior rule, where in the law itself is not allowed - the act before the ban.
If the game would be more correct as everyone wants, then we should punish or change something for everyone to start in a situation as equals, showing a lack of impartiality of the company, trying to please some and putting others at a different level, when who dictates the rules of the game is the company itself and when the rule set out nothing was forbidden.
For those who do not understand what I say, I'll give an example. Analyzing my guild and my fallows, I shall quote Bloodline, hated by some and loved by others.The Bloodline have been trading points (remembering that many guilds do this too) with the guild Tsunami to win the vanarch war. Many people complained about this situation in several ways. Many people complained about this situation in several ways, asking for a permanent ban and other several punishments for the guild. The point is that Bloodline did nothing against the rules because they were never written proving the dishonesty of the guild.
After several complaints from some players and others who exercise a certain influence inside the game, the "En Masse" decided to create new rules prohibiting the "instant entry" of "guild members", also saying that anyone who used to die helping allies guilds would have their points reset, but before the event happens there was no such rule.
So why now I will be punished? I can kill my character and let die if I want, I go where I want and leave when I want
but now I have limits to please some of the players, even with several others do not like it.
The En Masse once again proves his "impartiality" punishing ones and not others, no matter how it was done.
Edited by: Nasher
11 months ago
- Reason: Edited for better
