I'm on a "Medium" populated PvP server and it still takes forever to get a group going for a instance. Do you guys think they should merge the servers more?
Kuddle
Profile Options
#2
0
Transfer to VoT or JC.
Slubber
Profile Options
#3
0
The instance group queue time doesn't have to do with the general population, it's the absolute lack of tanks in this game.
Play a lancer and the longest queue you get is however many milliseconds it is between your finger clicking the mouse and releasing it.
Play a lancer and the longest queue you get is however many milliseconds it is between your finger clicking the mouse and releasing it.
nNyu
Profile Options
#4
0
Yup i have a 57 lancer and a 60 slayer.. lancer = instant que never qued yet... and the slayer.. upto 3 hours.
sofy
Profile Options
#5
0
I still believe they could merge some of the servers.
I'm on Blightwood and I can hear my echo pretty much in every zones I walk in.
I'm on Blightwood and I can hear my echo pretty much in every zones I walk in.
Shealee
Profile Options
#6
0
A lot of people are breaking from Tera after having reached max lvl, and with D3 coming out that is where most are (myself and husband included) however D3 will last MAYBE a month before folks beat the hardest difficulty and head back to their previous game, for us it is here.
You are expecting EmE to merge servers when they have to look at their actual subscriptions and where they are at before considering it, and most who are taking a break are not letting their subs expire.
Atheus
Profile Options
#7
0
I feel the same way as Pistallion. Questing anything above level 40 and you're lucky if you see a single other player before you log out. I'd definitely be happier with more people around, but stopped short of moving all my characters to Dragonfall when I realized all my characters' names were already taken there.
Naming conflicts would make a server merge a pain for players as well as EME, but maybe there is magically a couple of pairs or trios among the low population PvE servers which have very few naming conflicts. That'd be nice.
Naming conflicts would make a server merge a pain for players as well as EME, but maybe there is magically a couple of pairs or trios among the low population PvE servers which have very few naming conflicts. That'd be nice.
Sakubo
Profile Options
#8
0
I wouldnt mind them combining some of the lower pop pve servers after all I think it released with to many pve servers. As far as ques go they wont get better unless they allow warriors to que as tanks at least for level up instances since there just isnt enough poeple playing lancers.
Slubber
Profile Options
#9
0
VoT, JC and Dragonfall are just littered with life. Basilisk Crag, Feral Valley and Celestial hills are pretty decent as well. Then the rest are not so popular.
I was on 6 hours yesterday on Basiisk Crag in the 45-48 zone and saw at least 60-70 different people, that's not too bad for such a point in the game.
There was even a 5-6 person guild outlawed fighting outside of one of the town...I managed to get a kill on them, but they brought a 55, so for the rest of the day whenever I saw a member from that guild I went outlaw and killed them.
Killed 4 people from their guild total and only died once to the 55 originally. Feels good man, but now they've probably got a bounty on me.
I was on 6 hours yesterday on Basiisk Crag in the 45-48 zone and saw at least 60-70 different people, that's not too bad for such a point in the game.
There was even a 5-6 person guild outlawed fighting outside of one of the town...I managed to get a kill on them, but they brought a 55, so for the rest of the day whenever I saw a member from that guild I went outlaw and killed them.
Killed 4 people from their guild total and only died once to the 55 originally. Feels good man, but now they've probably got a bounty on me.
Caldera
Profile Options
#10
0
I could tell which day D3 was out by how my server felt. Since then things have been less busy. However my lancer still instana q's. And my other classes don't.