If they are going to gank...

Keyral Profile Options #381

0
0
Neutral
Kiros Lvl.60
Mount Tyrannas (PVP)
Popori Sorcerer
Lanikitty on 05/10/2012, 11:52 AM - view
It is funny that you accuse those of us who don't agree with low level ganking as being children, when doing just that is the epitome of being a spoiled rotten child. I refer to my previous statement of boys who kill ants with magnifying glasses and some how think that this makes them hot stuff.


Fact I've never killed a single lowbie =)

Stryker VOT Berserker
Nero VOT Lancer
Kiros VOT Sorc

I personally don't kill Lowbies but I don't care if others do because of infamy... When I see a Red I kill... Red = Dead... I'm not necessarily white knight either though because I'm not actively protecting lowbies.

So yeahhhh I support the ruleset not the ganking I support infamy because it's pretty fair punishment as I am actively killing Red members and I can see how irritating that must be =)
Edited by: Keyral about 1 year ago
Lanikitty Profile Options #382

0
0
Neutral
Keyral on 05/10/2012, 12:06 PM - view
Fact I've never killed a single lowbie =)

Stryker VOT Berserker
Nero VOT Lancer
Kiros VOT Sorc

I personally don't kill Lowbies but I don't care if others do because of infamy... When I see a Red I kill... Red = Dead... I'm not necessarily white knight either though because I'm not actively protecting lowbies.

So yeahhhh I support the ruleset not the ganking I support infamy because it's pretty fair punishment each day I log in I kill around 15 people red or white usually around my levels.

Congratulations, you are not one of the basement dwelling sociopaths who's main purpose in gaming is to impede or ruin other another player's experience. This is not to say that those kinds of players should not be dealt with in a harsher manner.
Keyral Profile Options #383

0
0
Neutral
Kiros Lvl.60
Mount Tyrannas (PVP)
Popori Sorcerer
Lanikitty on 05/10/2012, 12:09 PM - view
Keyral on 05/10/2012, 12:06 PM
Fact I've never killed a single lowbie =)

Stryker VOT Berserker
Nero VOT Lancer
Kiros VOT Sorc

I personally don't kill Lowbies but I don't care if others do because of infamy... When I see a Red I kill... Red = Dead... I'm not necessarily white knight either though because I'm not actively protecting lowbies.

So yeahhhh I support the ruleset not the ganking I support infamy because it's pretty fair punishment each day I log in I kill around 15 people red or white usually around my levels.

Congratulations, you are not one of the basement dwelling sociopaths who's main purpose in gaming is to impede or ruin other another player's experience. This is not to say that those kinds of players should not be dealt with in a harsher manner.


No I think having the entire server killing you constantly because of a red name is pretty fair to me...

You don't need harsher punishments for these people... 10 minutes of ganking shouldn't = 20 days of not being able to play because you can't PVE or PVP. Being killed 24/7 is a great punishment and fits the crime of killing others

What I am doing for the community is creating a LVL 11 toon for my guild to kill over and over again for anyone that wants infamy so they don't need to hunt down other lowbies to get what they want.

Maybe you should do the same for your guild.
Edited by: Keyral about 1 year ago
Zackyd Profile Options #384

0
0
Neutral
Keyral on 05/10/2012, 12:14 PM - view
Lanikitty on 05/10/2012, 12:09 PM
Keyral on 05/10/2012, 12:06 PM
Fact I've never killed a single lowbie =)

Stryker VOT Berserker
Nero VOT Lancer
Kiros VOT Sorc

I personally don't kill Lowbies but I don't care if others do because of infamy... When I see a Red I kill... Red = Dead... I'm not necessarily white knight either though because I'm not actively protecting lowbies.

So yeahhhh I support the ruleset not the ganking I support infamy because it's pretty fair punishment each day I log in I kill around 15 people red or white usually around my levels.

Congratulations, you are not one of the basement dwelling sociopaths who's main purpose in gaming is to impede or ruin other another player's experience. This is not to say that those kinds of players should not be dealt with in a harsher manner.


No I think having the entire server killing you constantly because of a red name is pretty fair to me...

You don't need harsher punishments for these people... 10 minutes of ganking shouldn't = 20 days of not being able to play because you can't PVE or PVP. Being killed 24/7 is a great punishment and fits the crime of killing others

What I am doing for the community is creating a LVL 11 toon for my guild to kill over and over again for anyone that wants infamy so they don't need to hunt down other lowbies to get what they want.

Maybe you should do the same for your guild.


how does infamy stop you from doing pve or pvp?(just wondering)
holdehamlet Profile Options #385

0
0
Neutral
I think the system you mentioned should be implemented for tag-team ganks.

I don't mind ganking but when you team up with someone just to mess with their questing, that's just lame.

1 v 1 ganking is fine because hey it's a pvp server and at least the person getting ganked has a chance to fight back.
Prolixitasty Profile Options #386

0
0
Neutral
holdehamlet on 05/10/2012, 01:27 PM - view
I think the system you mentioned should be implemented for tag-team ganks.



I don't mind ganking but when you team up with someone just to mess with their questing, that's just lame.



1 v 1 ganking is fine because hey it's a pvp server and at least the person getting ganked has a chance to fight back.


Lvl 20 has a chance vs a Lvl 60?

Derp.

Lvl 40 has a chance vs a Lvl 60?

Derp.

Lvl 50 has a chance vs a lvl 60?

Derp

Lvl 55 has a chance vs a lvl 60?

Yerp.

InVizO Profile Options #387

0
0
Neutral
QQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQ



QQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQ
Prolixitasty Profile Options #388

0
0
Neutral
InVizO on 05/10/2012, 01:29 PM - view
QQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQ







QQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQ


Lulaloo. Best. Argument. Ever.
Zackyd Profile Options #389

0
0
Neutral
So how about just when your pvping in lowbie areas your damage output drops to the max a lowbie at that area can do, this would make low player to high player pvp less one sided and still provide infamy because high level players don't have any real reason to be in a lowbie area expect to try and hinder their gameplay. this way the player with the better skill wins than the player who is a higher level or better gear.

I don't see how this idea would kill owpvp as it encourages same level pvp while not being to harsh on players who want to kill lower level players. Because there is no real punishment for attacking lower level players.


what i removed in my edit:

why not just use the korean pvp system?
Edited by: Zackyd about 1 year ago
Darkwulf Profile Options #390

0
0
Neutral
Because the K Tera rules are dumb. I bought this game for its open pvp, and so did a lot of other people. But you can stop trying to get it changed, they are changing PVE servers a little bit to keep the carebears happy.

"We are working to get GvG on PvE servers, but we want to make sure it is consensual for both guilds before we implement it. In the current system, one guild just declares war on another guild and that's not how we'd like GvG to work on PvE servers. :) "

Sounds like a happy la la land where you can have have your perfectly equal and balanced pvp fights.