Please remove the remaining 3 channels!!!

InVizO Profile Options #1

0
0
Neutral
As a whole i believe the community would like to see a 1-2 channel game, the remaining 6 are simply singleplayer/carebear mode.


Obviously i created this solely to counter the other carebear topics.

We don't want 8 channels, I paid for a subscription based game, the channel system is an archaic system for online games that don't require subs (guild wars) because it takes next to nothing on server bandwidth; therfore being f2p.

Honestly the best system is to just have the game automatically create a channel or 2 when one fills.
Dreadspectre Profile Options #2

0
0
Neutral
Go level up..later zones only have 2-3 channels.
CutlassJack Profile Options #3

0
0
Neutral
What's best for you isn't always best for everyone else. And everyone pays for a subscription based game, not just you. I don't force you to play in lower populated channels. Unless you want to pay my subscription, I'd appreciate the same courtesy.

The game defaults everyone to the first two channels, the only way to go higher is to willingly move. So not really seeing the issue of letting everyone decide what's best for them.
InVizO Profile Options #4

0
0
Neutral
Dreadspectre on 05/10/2012, 10:40 AM - view
Go level up..later zones only have 2-3 channels.


i'm 47 and the sole purpose of this thread is to ensure enmasse doesnt listen to the carebears.
Invalid Profile Options #5

0
0
Neutral
Personally ,I would hav eliked to see between 1 and 3 channels per zone (for now)

After Vanarch hits, I would like to see it where Vanarchs who flag their province as PVE get channels, Vanarchs who flag their province as PVP get no channels.
InVizO Profile Options #6

0
0
Neutral
CutlassJack on 05/10/2012, 10:43 AM - view
What's best for you isn't always best for everyone else. And everyone pays for a subscription based game, not just you. I don't force you to play in lower populated channels. Unless you want to pay my subscription, I'd appreciate the same courtesy.

The game defaults everyone to the first two channels, the only way to go higher is to willingly move. So not really seeing the issue of letting everyone decide what's best for them.


how about make no channel population limit and increase quest spawns?


I understand making channels for newer games when quests r difficult but after 30 there really is no need for them because the population of channel 1 is usually low.



plus channel systems make GVG and pvp system worse.
Dreadspectre Profile Options #7

0
0
Neutral
If the players want to "hide" from the GvG/PvP by not staying in channel 1/2 then you make fun of them and they will have their server reputation ruined. You win the internets gg.
CutlassJack Profile Options #8

0
0
Neutral
InVizO on 05/10/2012, 10:45 AM - view
how about make no channel population limit and increase quest spawns?


I understand making channels for newer games when quests r difficult but after 30 there really is no need for them because the population of channel 1 is usually low.



plus channel systems make GVG and pvp system worse.


Quest spawns aren't the only reason for more channels. Some prefer them because they get better game performance and find it easier to keep track of their groups with less people around. I group 100% of the time and prefer higher channels for those reasons.

I can certainly understand why PvP servers would prefer less channels and thats fair. But not everyone plays on PvP servers.
InVizO Profile Options #9

0
0
Neutral
Dreadspectre on 05/10/2012, 10:50 AM - view
If the players want to "hide" from the GvG/PvP by not staying in channel 1/2 then you make fun of them and they will have their server reputation ruined. You win the internets gg.


drop guild if u r in a pvp server and have an active GVG and don't like it, or go to pve server.
Osolo Profile Options #10

0
0
Neutral
There was a post or interview somewhere that said the game now creates channels beyond 4 on its own when population gets above certian numbers...