Poll: Cross Server LFD

Ozruk Profile Options #51

0

notalent on 2012-02-24 12:42:22 UTC - view
Its a great thing for the game and for players with limited time. The open world pvp idea is a joke anyways because the area around dungeons are safe. At this point in my life I just don't have 3 hours to spend finding a group in chat, getting into an instance and then running the place. Also the odds of getting a retard in a pug group doesn't change whether you use LFD or use chat spam to get the group together.

Ozruk on 2012-02-24 12:35:48 UTC

So you should be equally rewarded for doing less?



Ciaphas on 2012-02-24 01:50:44 UTC

What the F is wrong with you people.

Doing less? Same damn dungeon.

What you meant to say is: "So, you feel that you shouldn't have to potentially spend quite a long time spamming channels to get a group... So, you feel that you shouldn't have to spend 5-10mins auto-running to the instance..."

It's not a hard concept... TEDIOUS and TIME CONSUMING DOES NOT EQUAL CHALLENGING. It is just tedious and time consuming.

And the whole arguement of the difference in time between having a cross server tool and not is a few minutes is completely mind blowing stupid. It's been PROVEN in games that added the cross server LFD. You can scream and deny that all you want, doesn't change it from being fact. I can go outside and tell everyone the sky is Purple, it doesn't make it purple, it just makes me look like a moron.


This is how it starts.

"Its a great thing for the game and for players with limited time"
Its a great thing players with limited time"

I think you shouldn't have to interact with other players to do a dungeon, clicking a button is better for the game.

The dungeons are too hard and take too long, they should be shorter and easier.

We need an X class to complete the encounter, more classes should offer the same abilities (homogenization).

Why should someone who has more time to play then me be allowed to progress further in the game? There should be a point system so I can buy my gear and be on par with minimal effort (welfare epics).

I have a real life and that somehow inhibits my situational awareness, I can't be expected to just move out of the fire.

I have a real life and that somehow inhibits my ability to understand simple mechanics and use an internet search engine to spend a few minutes to learn basic information that greatly improves my performance.

etc.


Edited by: Ozruk about 1 year ago - Reason: made the quotes less dumb.
strawbeary Profile Options #52

0

Blintz on 2012-02-24 13:05:41 UTC - view
Every MMO seems to have this thread, I posted in this type of thread 100 times so ill be very blunt and short.

1.People who like LFG systems go ahead and use it.

2.People who feels LFG kills experience of the game dont use it. And dont QQ about no one wants to join a normal (non-LFG) party, go make some friends.


The Pro-LFG side isnt forcing everyone to use it, but the Anti-LFG side wants no one to use it. Elitism at its core.
Actually it does effect the community as a whole but im an elitist so i dont care about the community i only care about my self so ofc im wrong for wanting a server to have a united community as opposed to having random people from different servers meeting and never meeting again
strawbeary Profile Options #53

0

notalent on 2012-02-24 13:08:18 UTC - view


Maybe we are just at different stages of life. I value every minute of my time. Spending 5-10mins numLock autorunning to a dungeon is a waste of my time. It adds NO value, only eats time.

I play MMO's because I enjoy them, but I'm past that age that being a slave to one is cool.
I do value my time actually, however,if you have a instant teleport inside an instance, do you seriously expect a few people to use it? Sure it's fine for PvE but what is open world pvp mean if no1 is in the open world?
Crica Profile Options #54

0

strawbeary on 2012-02-24 13:08:48 UTC - view
im wrong for wanting a server to have a united community as opposed to having random people from different servers meeting and never meeting again


wanting it to happen is not wrong

forcing others to make it happen is wrong, however
Edited by: Crica about 1 year ago
Blintz Profile Options #55

0

strawbeary on 2012-02-24 13:08:48 UTC - view
Actually it does effect the community as a whole but im an elitist so i dont care about the community i only care about my self so ofc im wrong for wanting a server to have a united community as opposed to having random people from different servers meeting and never meeting again


You want to prevent "Others" from being able to play with people from random servers.

With LFG in place you can easily have a 100% party with only your server. But you choose to direct your focus on what "Others" are doing.

Its the same worn out anti-LFG mantra. Ultimately they want to decide whats "Best for the entire community" and not let the community decide for itself. Because we both know the community will embrace LFG and not reject it (Which they have the full power to do)
Edited by: Blintz about 1 year ago
notalent Profile Options #56

0

0
Neutral
Panzi Lvl.60
Tempest Reach (PVE)
Elin Priest
strawbeary on 2012-02-24 13:06:35 UTC - view
When did i say it needed to be challenging, i think your on the wrong thread bud


You serious?

You are saying you don't want it "EASY"...what the F is the opposite of EASY?
Crica Profile Options #57

0

strawbeary on 2012-02-24 13:11:09 UTC - view
if you have a instant teleport inside an instance, do you seriously expect a few people to use it?


I expect everyone who enjoys using it to have the choice to use it if they want to

i expect everyone who does not enjoy using it to have the choice to not use it if they dont want to
strawbeary Profile Options #58

0

Crica on 2012-02-24 13:11:10 UTC - view
strawbeary on 2012-02-24 13:08:48 UTC
im wrong for wanting a server to have a united community as opposed to having random people from different servers meeting and never meeting again


wanting it to happen is not wrong

forcing others to do it is wrong, however
Honestly I don't even know why im arguing with you people at this time.....i said we don't need it at this time because we have 4 [filtered] servers, how will it effect you so much if your server is already populated enough, would you rather make friends or be in groups with random people you meet and never speak to nor hear about again
unkycorona Profile Options #59

0

I voted "no", but that doesn't mean I don't think any type of LFD system should be avoided. Just keep it within the same server.
Lorenia Profile Options #60

0

I personally don't see a problem with it but I can see why many may think it will destroy the community.

My opinion is no.