notebene
Profile Options
#121
0
Few things.
It wasn't just the Elin. They were the poster child (pun intended?) for what happened, but the other races were subjected to it in more subtle ways.
The 'Easternization' argument is an interesting one, I guess? I don't know what it means to them culturally, if it has far more ramifications than skimpy clothing does in America (?), but I'm betting there's an apples/oranges in there somewhere.
The Europe one was interesting, when that story came out a week or so ago, where their 'thing' is the gore. Reminds me a bit of "This Film Is Not Yet Rated", especially for us and the MPAA.
I don't understand why it isn't addressed as 'options and choice'.
If we're supposed to be so epicly tolerant, the country of all stray dogs and all dogs are welcome, why aren't we given options and choices?
If you don't want to wear those things, then you should have options not to wear them. I should have the choice to wear them. This should never end in someone's choices and options coming at the expense of someone else's options and choices being taken away.
Now, obviously we're not talking about murder. Someone would argue "but we have to take away your choice to murder because that infringes on my choice to live". Well....yes, yes it does, and yes, that makes sense.
We're talking about a game. Harmless, fun, artful little game.
It just seems to me that when this 'westernization' happens, it's always about one thing. The female form. And it never ends up being about choice. It ends up being about agenda. It gets dressed up (pun intended) in other arguments, but it always seems to come back to that one thing. It's not about choice and options. It's about specifically wanting to take away those options and choices, and that seems wrong to me.
With respect to 'westernization'. Tell me how my choices and options would have negatively impacted you? Take a look at Madonna in the early 80s. Should we have 'westernized' that and not allow her to dress like that so you didn't have to look at it? It wasn't handled that way, was it? That would have been insane, right? To take away her choices and options like that?
Why is it ok to do that in a video game? Are MMOs a refuge for people to enforce their agenda when they couldn't in the real world? Is it a training ground to work on your lobbying skills before you take it to the real world? I hope not. That would be sad indeed.
MMOs used to be a place where you could come to escape reality, and not care about how crazy your country is and get away from everyone's agenda and the person you were adventuring with could be in France.
Now, we are all locked back in our little corners of the world, with our own 'versions' of the game, subject to many of the agendas that propagate each of our corners.
Yay globalization? :(
It wasn't just the Elin. They were the poster child (pun intended?) for what happened, but the other races were subjected to it in more subtle ways.
The 'Easternization' argument is an interesting one, I guess? I don't know what it means to them culturally, if it has far more ramifications than skimpy clothing does in America (?), but I'm betting there's an apples/oranges in there somewhere.
The Europe one was interesting, when that story came out a week or so ago, where their 'thing' is the gore. Reminds me a bit of "This Film Is Not Yet Rated", especially for us and the MPAA.
I don't understand why it isn't addressed as 'options and choice'.
If we're supposed to be so epicly tolerant, the country of all stray dogs and all dogs are welcome, why aren't we given options and choices?
If you don't want to wear those things, then you should have options not to wear them. I should have the choice to wear them. This should never end in someone's choices and options coming at the expense of someone else's options and choices being taken away.
Now, obviously we're not talking about murder. Someone would argue "but we have to take away your choice to murder because that infringes on my choice to live". Well....yes, yes it does, and yes, that makes sense.
We're talking about a game. Harmless, fun, artful little game.
It just seems to me that when this 'westernization' happens, it's always about one thing. The female form. And it never ends up being about choice. It ends up being about agenda. It gets dressed up (pun intended) in other arguments, but it always seems to come back to that one thing. It's not about choice and options. It's about specifically wanting to take away those options and choices, and that seems wrong to me.
With respect to 'westernization'. Tell me how my choices and options would have negatively impacted you? Take a look at Madonna in the early 80s. Should we have 'westernized' that and not allow her to dress like that so you didn't have to look at it? It wasn't handled that way, was it? That would have been insane, right? To take away her choices and options like that?
Why is it ok to do that in a video game? Are MMOs a refuge for people to enforce their agenda when they couldn't in the real world? Is it a training ground to work on your lobbying skills before you take it to the real world? I hope not. That would be sad indeed.
MMOs used to be a place where you could come to escape reality, and not care about how crazy your country is and get away from everyone's agenda and the person you were adventuring with could be in France.
Now, we are all locked back in our little corners of the world, with our own 'versions' of the game, subject to many of the agendas that propagate each of our corners.
Yay globalization? :(