Lowbei
Profile Options
#1
0
at first i was thinking, surely this is a joke...
but after doing a few nexus runs for a few weeks now, zerg pveing mobs that barely render in 3fps lagfests with no skill, thought, or tactics involved, i am beginning to think that they just dont want competitive pvp in this game
the client files contain the pvp arenas, the pvp gear, and the agnitor rep. is it really so hard to put those together and give us 5v5 arenas?
lets jump in the wayback machine shall we?
back in 2008, a company named funcom released a game that looked amazing and had a great combat system. however they pushed back the competitive pvp from launch, stating it will be out when they felt it was ready. the game had owpvp, but it was not competitive at all and offered zero rewards. after a month, subs dropped from over a million to less than 500k and i stuck around hoping they would figure it out. next month it dropped to less than 200k, and by that point we had seen everything the game had to offer other than competitive pvp. after the 3rd month the game dropped off to less than 50k subs, and the official consensus of the internet was that funcom failed on epic levels, and no matter what they did to the game after that, nobody was going to give them a second chance.
this starting to sound familiar? it should if you have played tera to endgame.
i like tera but im having a very hard time defending it to my friends who ask "can we pvp for pvp gear" and "are there competitive group v group arenas?"
how do YOU feel about the games pvp?
but after doing a few nexus runs for a few weeks now, zerg pveing mobs that barely render in 3fps lagfests with no skill, thought, or tactics involved, i am beginning to think that they just dont want competitive pvp in this game
the client files contain the pvp arenas, the pvp gear, and the agnitor rep. is it really so hard to put those together and give us 5v5 arenas?
lets jump in the wayback machine shall we?
back in 2008, a company named funcom released a game that looked amazing and had a great combat system. however they pushed back the competitive pvp from launch, stating it will be out when they felt it was ready. the game had owpvp, but it was not competitive at all and offered zero rewards. after a month, subs dropped from over a million to less than 500k and i stuck around hoping they would figure it out. next month it dropped to less than 200k, and by that point we had seen everything the game had to offer other than competitive pvp. after the 3rd month the game dropped off to less than 50k subs, and the official consensus of the internet was that funcom failed on epic levels, and no matter what they did to the game after that, nobody was going to give them a second chance.
this starting to sound familiar? it should if you have played tera to endgame.
i like tera but im having a very hard time defending it to my friends who ask "can we pvp for pvp gear" and "are there competitive group v group arenas?"
how do YOU feel about the games pvp?