Mnemosyne
Profile Options
#81
0
Garafyn on 06/29/2012, 08:27 PM - view
Archers don't need a buff; people need to learn to play better. Seriously, I'm tired of hearing this. A good player can play an Archer at the same level a good player can play anything else; it might just require a tad bit more finesse on the player's part than playing, say, a Sorcerer.
Berserkers do need a small buff, and they're getting it soon. KTERA just received theirs not too long ago, so we're due for it soon. Stop complaining about it; Berserkers are still viable DPS. See the above caveat to Archers.
Lancers don't need to move faster or do more damage. I play one and I have not experienced an issue tanking anything unless I'm getting input lag, which has nothing to do with the game. HM Fane, HM Balder's, etc. There is nothing Lancers need a buff for aside from a small amount of extra mobility, perhaps, which hey, they're getting with Backstep in the next major patch. But let's be impatient like with Berserkers, right?
All of the classes are viable in any scenario. It's up the player that is behind the character to utilize them fully and play them to the level of the easier classes. Slayers are prevailent because you can play one while not being good at it and still win because of their high damage and broad range of utility. However, all it takes is a skilled player that's done some research and testing on their own to take any other class and stomp on that bad Slayer.
TL;DR: I'm tired of people complaining that class A is underpowered and class B is overpowered, thus game is unbalanced. Yes, some tweaks need to be made, and some of those tweaks are being made. But if you can't play any of the classes competitively at endgame then it is not the class' fault. It's your fault.
Ty, I will now be un-subbing. I thought they were balancing it all out better. IE giving Archers a buff, giving zerkers a inccrease in charge speed, lancers a movement and dps buff, buffing warrior(Oh they KIND of did). This game is sooo unbalanced. When the majority of the players play Slayers, and classes like Archers and Mystics go dang near untouched there is obviously something wrong. Bye bye tera!
Archers don't need a buff; people need to learn to play better. Seriously, I'm tired of hearing this. A good player can play an Archer at the same level a good player can play anything else; it might just require a tad bit more finesse on the player's part than playing, say, a Sorcerer.
Berserkers do need a small buff, and they're getting it soon. KTERA just received theirs not too long ago, so we're due for it soon. Stop complaining about it; Berserkers are still viable DPS. See the above caveat to Archers.
Lancers don't need to move faster or do more damage. I play one and I have not experienced an issue tanking anything unless I'm getting input lag, which has nothing to do with the game. HM Fane, HM Balder's, etc. There is nothing Lancers need a buff for aside from a small amount of extra mobility, perhaps, which hey, they're getting with Backstep in the next major patch. But let's be impatient like with Berserkers, right?
All of the classes are viable in any scenario. It's up the player that is behind the character to utilize them fully and play them to the level of the easier classes. Slayers are prevailent because you can play one while not being good at it and still win because of their high damage and broad range of utility. However, all it takes is a skilled player that's done some research and testing on their own to take any other class and stomp on that bad Slayer.
TL;DR: I'm tired of people complaining that class A is underpowered and class B is overpowered, thus game is unbalanced. Yes, some tweaks need to be made, and some of those tweaks are being made. But if you can't play any of the classes competitively at endgame then it is not the class' fault. It's your fault.