Homosexuality? Evolution or Random Randomness?

Calculator Profile Options #11

0

From an evolutionary perspective being [filtered] is an anomaly and pretty much a dead end since genetics don't get passed on.

Speaking of social structures and norms has no place in evo discussion since Nature doesn't take either into account.

Not reproducing is evolutionary disadvantageous.

The sexy, and the smooth talkers, shall inherit the earth.
Edited by: Calculator about 1 year ago
Scythes Profile Options #12

0

Mellusion on 04/26/2012, 05:13 AM - view
Basically my theory states that Human Beings are Heard Animals


Skimmed, saw this, and you lost all credibility.
FranBunnyFFXII Profile Options #13

0

Calculator on 04/26/2012, 08:35 PM - view
From an evolutionary perspective being [filtered] is an anomaly and pretty much a dead end since genetics don't get passed on.

Speaking of social structures and norms has no place in evo discussion since Nature doesn't take either into account.

Not reproducing is evolutionary disadvantageous.

The sexy, and the smooth talkers, shall inherit the earth.

This is the dumbest arguement in the history of homosexuality.

Homosexuals can procreate, they arent infertile, they can still mate with the opposite sex and create children.

this is the stupidest, and one of the most ignorant and uneducated argument in the world.
Calculator Profile Options #14

0

FranBunnyFFXII on 04/26/2012, 10:20 PM - view
Calculator on 04/26/2012, 08:35 PM
From an evolutionary perspective being [filtered] is an anomaly and pretty much a dead end since genetics don't get passed on.

Speaking of social structures and norms has no place in evo discussion since Nature doesn't take either into account.

Not reproducing is evolutionary disadvantageous.

The sexy, and the smooth talkers, shall inherit the earth.

This is the dumbest arguement in the history of homosexuality.

Homosexuals can procreate, they arent infertile, they can still mate with the opposite sex and create children.

this is the stupidest, and one of the most ignorant and uneducated argument in the world.


They don't have any desire too, No desire to get a chick pregnant is evolutionarily disadvantageous.

Don't try to convince me that [filtered] guys are having kids with women because outside of rare cases it's simply not true.

Go ahead prove me wrong.
Lunaus Profile Options #15

0

0
Neutral
Lunaus Lvl.1
Mount Tyrannas (PVP)
Castanic Slayer
I think it might somewhat evolutionary in a sense.. we know we're over populated, so we go for the same sex know we won't reproduce offspring from any sexual acts. I dunno, it's a thought I developed while skimming through this thread.

I know in no way do we progress as a whole, but at least we stifle the production of more beings when there's too many without a species to control the population like in the animal kingdom.
Lunaus Profile Options #16

0

0
Neutral
Lunaus Lvl.1
Mount Tyrannas (PVP)
Castanic Slayer
Calculator on 04/26/2012, 10:27 PM - view
They don't have any desire too, No desire to get a chick pregnant is evolutionarily disadvantageous.

Don't try to convince me that [filtered] guys are having kids with women because outside of rare cases it's simply not true.

Go ahead prove me wrong.


Some homosexual males have sex with females to get a child to share with their partner, but they do donate semen and look for women willing to bare a child for them.
Edited by: Lunaus about 1 year ago - Reason: Typo'd with my statement
CoconutOil Profile Options #17

0

Homosexuality is UNNATURAL no matter which way you slice it.

Men looking at other men in "that way" is unnatural and promiscuity in women is unnatural. Women shouldn't be lusting after men ever. Women should be a bit more reserved and conservative with their manner of dress, speech, and thoughts.

Evolution made the [filtered] to fit inside the female [filtered], not inside the butt. I have no problem with [filtered]s dating, but marriage is out of the question because why would the government legalize something unnatural? That would be like saying if you have two bulls you can marry them to each other. I'm not homophobic, but I don't want [filtered]s intruding on how things are run in my country and trying to change the entire social structure and disrupt religion, families, confuse kids from mom-dad households, etc. It's just a really complex issue.
CoconutOil Profile Options #18

0

Calculator on 04/26/2012, 10:27 PM - view
FranBunnyFFXII on 04/26/2012, 10:20 PM
Calculator on 04/26/2012, 08:35 PM
From an evolutionary perspective being [filtered] is an anomaly and pretty much a dead end since genetics don't get passed on.

Speaking of social structures and norms has no place in evo discussion since Nature doesn't take either into account.

Not reproducing is evolutionary disadvantageous.

The sexy, and the smooth talkers, shall inherit the earth.

This is the dumbest arguement in the history of homosexuality.

Homosexuals can procreate, they arent infertile, they can still mate with the opposite sex and create children.

this is the stupidest, and one of the most ignorant and uneducated argument in the world.


They don't have any desire too, No desire to get a chick pregnant is evolutionarily disadvantageous.

Don't try to convince me that [filtered] guys are having kids with women because outside of rare cases it's simply not true.

Go ahead prove me wrong.


I'm against [filtered] rights, but your logic is stupid.

There IS an advantage to not mating - population control in a species.
Humans are communal creatures and often prefer groups. If you are the leader of your tribe/household, it's easier to feed 20 people than it is to feed 50 people.
If there's more of 1 species, that species takes over and nature has to even things out. Disease is more likely to spread when there's more of 1 species.

Those are just 2 examples, but I'd be happy to provide more.
marmoset Profile Options #19

0

CoconutOil on 04/27/2012, 01:06 AM
Homosexuality is UNNATURAL no matter which way you slice it.


Yes, in the same same way wearing glasses, taking over-the-counter or prescription drugs, wearing shoes, driving a car or talking on a phone is "unnatural"
Mellusion Profile Options #20

0

Calculator on 04/26/2012, 08:35 PM - view
From an evolutionary perspective being [filtered] is an anomaly and pretty much a dead end since genetics don't get passed on.

Speaking of social structures and norms has no place in evo discussion since Nature doesn't take either into account.

Not reproducing is evolutionary disadvantageous.

The sexy, and the smooth talkers, shall inherit the earth.


Part of my theory eludes to the fact that we are not just speaking of pure homosexuality. Sexuality on a whole, i believe for even as much as 50 % of the population can be something of question or expirmentation at some point or another.

Ive known i was [filtered] and have been only attracted to men exlusively since i was 7. Not until i was an adult did i first spend time sexually with a women, im 27 now and have had 3 female partners. ITs extremely rare and i still introduce myself as a homosexual to most people however.

I feel that there is genetically inscribed material, dorment, or not, skipped a generation or not, locked and kept inside all of us. Things we might never imagine or know to think of. This is the wonder of life, Genetic memeory, and infinity.

on a just plain personal note, i believe the universe is infinite so that everything would have an equal chance to exist and fine its place to exist. For truly everything can find a home in this place.

Even the smallest pull over infinite time will also bring two things together again no matter how far away they are. Even through death, the very base materials which comprise each one of us is as old as anything in the universe.

I believe nothing is lost forver...and life does not exist without reason or rythem.