http://www.metacritic.com/game/pc/tera/critic-reviews

now let's take a gander at the bottom, the last link on the page.

http://www.ign.com/articles/2012/05/25/tera-review

oh Hey IGN how are you do-SIX POINT FIVE WAAAAAAT!?

hahaha, yes ladies and genltemen, the grand gaming news phenomenon we known as Imagine Game Network or IGN reviewed the game and issued a 6.5. who agrees/disagrees?

the highest number and the most praise was the graphics, which are just astounding and call me a fanboy but I believe graphics using DX9 like that deserve at least a 9.

I disagree with 6.5. 7.0 is more like it.

6.5 means EME didn'y pay IGN anything.
That is all.

Quote: Catatonic on 05/25/2012, 11:37 PM - view

I agree, Swtor got a much higher rating... how is that? They paid for it. Swtor vrs Tera. Swtor has a bit of a better story, and Tera has a better more innovated combat, and had more features available at launch, well at least at NA launch. I agree with many others and must say I just can't trust what IGN posted and not sure anyone else should either.

just wanted to through this in there:
http://www.ign.com/search/product?query=swtor

Swtor got a 9. A 9! And Swtor launched with more bugs, and easy mode content that was completed in less than 2 weeks of launch. Combat was pretty much a tab targeting system like WoW minus the auto hit. And aside from VO questing brough NOTHING new to the table. I do feel this shows that a IGN score can be bought and no score they post could ever be considered serious.

"Given that you can play as a little bunny girl race (which, in itself, is already disturbing enough)"

lol-@ this guy