of course it all boils down to the player's skill but curious on what everyone thinks is the better solo pvp class?
last few CBT i tried all classes except sorc,myst,priest and lancer.
probably gonna try a lancer this coming CBT since i read their more for people that tend to solo pvp a lot while serks are more gpvp.
but yeah how are they for solo pvp both in early stages and end game?
zerks are not good 1 v 1, lancers are,zerk shine in group vs group, lancer turns into a harass and "support, death pull" class
i say "death pull" because if a lancer pulls u, stuns and sorc sleep while he charge up his nuke + a zerk charges his burst= gg, and at lvl 60 lancers get a skill that aoe pull bind ppl...so yea GG if he didn't miss.
If i was to pick the best 1 vs 1 atm as of beta i would say its slayer or mystic....but this game is more group vs group imo!
Lancer and Sorcerer are the best 1v1 classes at 60, the only issue they have is with fighting each other. Zerker is extremely dumbed down as it is right now and mostly you have to rely on your opponent making a mistake rather than you knowing what to do. You simply lack the tools of a slayer or lancer for 1v1 and are forced into the same situation every time.
The reason he seems fast is because he is not put into combat untill him or another person deal dmg to the other, since he is always getting the first shoot he is getting to them with his out of combat speed. to kite a zerker you should always try to hit them with a simple ability from range to put them into combat speed.
thanks for the responses, guess imma try out lancer this CBT since i like to solo pvp more.
already did a zerk and not sure if i have the patience to get to a high lvl when you're suppose to get the better skills that combat their slowness or w/e it was