3 Capital cities.
3 week ruling period (same as Vanarch)
1 Siege per week
Seems like a good addition.
3 week ruling period (same as Vanarch)
1 Siege per week
Seems like a good addition.
suggestion:
make a system that requires you be in a top zerg guild to enjoy a portion of content.
ohh wait - that sounds like a solid waste of dev money.
make a system that requires you be in a top zerg guild to enjoy a portion of content.
ohh wait - that sounds like a solid waste of dev money.
Fatwa
Profile Options
#3
0
Sieging is not part of the stated TERA design. From what has been officially communicated to us, they think they have something that is better than your standard fare siege gameplay.
I think that's a positive step in the right direction for a new MMO to be taking.
I think that's a positive step in the right direction for a new MMO to be taking.
Fatwa on 2012-02-20 07:47:31 UTC
+1
Sieging is not part of the stated TERA design. From what has been officially communicated to us, they think they have something that is better than your standard fare siege gameplay.
I think that's a positive step in the right direction for a new MMO to be taking.
+1
Talaraine
Profile Options
#5
0
Anthraxsnax on 2012-02-20 07:34:04 UTC
Putting in a political system to be able to outvote said zerg guild should they become a menace then seems like a solid waste of dev money.
What happened to no restrictions on pvp?
suggestion:
make a system that requires you be in a top zerg guild to enjoy a portion of content.
ohh wait - that sounds like a solid waste of dev money.
Putting in a political system to be able to outvote said zerg guild should they become a menace then seems like a solid waste of dev money.
What happened to no restrictions on pvp?
Drekor
Profile Options
#6
0
Fatwa on 2012-02-20 07:47:31 UTC
People really think group dueling is better than "standard fare" siege gameplay.?
Sieging is not part of the stated TERA design. From what has been officially communicated to us, they think they have something that is better than your standard fare siege gameplay.
I think that's a positive step in the right direction for a new MMO to be taking.
People really think group dueling is better than "standard fare" siege gameplay.?
Cogbyrn
Profile Options
#7
0
Drekor on 2012-02-20 22:50:22 UTC
I'm hard-pressed to believe group dueling is the improvement they had in mind over siege gameplay. I could be wrong, but that makes absolutely no sense to me.
People really think group dueling is better than "standard fare" siege gameplay.?
I'm hard-pressed to believe group dueling is the improvement they had in mind over siege gameplay. I could be wrong, but that makes absolutely no sense to me.
Fatwa
Profile Options
#8
0
Drekor on 2012-02-20 22:50:22 UTC
Deathmatch PvP was not the system being discussed. Please go attempt to be witty elsewhere.
People really think group dueling is better than "standard fare" siege gameplay.?
Deathmatch PvP was not the system being discussed. Please go attempt to be witty elsewhere.
Fatwa on 2012-02-20 22:55:51 UTC
If you wouldn't mind what were you refering to then?
Deathmatch PvP was not the system being discussed. Please go attempt to be witty elsewhere.
If you wouldn't mind what were you refering to then?
Fatwa
Profile Options
#10
0
thedudeprt2 on 2012-02-20 23:09:34 UTC
Deathmatch PvP were already being openly discussed at the time BrotherMagneto made his comment regarding EME's stance towards Siege. Later down the road, Server vs Server news started to trickle out of Korea. We don't know if that is specifically what was being considered, but we do know that based on timing, Deathmatch PvP is not what was being discussed.
Had the forum community had foresight, they would have voted to archive the forum, and I would be able to provide all sorts of wonderful official quotes for you. However, they got greedy and voted not to, so I have none to give as Google Caching is spotty.
If you wouldn't mind what were you refering to then?
Deathmatch PvP were already being openly discussed at the time BrotherMagneto made his comment regarding EME's stance towards Siege. Later down the road, Server vs Server news started to trickle out of Korea. We don't know if that is specifically what was being considered, but we do know that based on timing, Deathmatch PvP is not what was being discussed.
Had the forum community had foresight, they would have voted to archive the forum, and I would be able to provide all sorts of wonderful official quotes for you. However, they got greedy and voted not to, so I have none to give as Google Caching is spotty.