Quote: YourMother000001 on 02/01/2013, 09:38 PM

so the new skill change for Priest : Guardian Sanctuary’s cooldown has reduced to 35 seconds. (from patch notes)



Guardian Sanctuary LAST 30 SECONDS. It gives immunity to ALL STUN AND MOVEMENT RESTRICT.



NOW 35 Sec CD.



ARE YOU TELLING ME PRIEST ARE NOW UNSTUNNABLE? 5 SECOND IS NOT EVEN ENOUGH TO KILL A PRIEST EVEN IF THERE 30 PEOPLE. LOL

That is not immunity, just hight resist. For me that is ok only one class what can remove CC is hard to stun-lock.



Ofc. I do not think that is nor perfect. But better than pernament CC-fest. IMO this skill should be removed, but only with global nerf for all CC in game.





With all this cry about priest - THIS CLASS CAN NOT KILL! So what is wrong with high survival ability?

So many bad warriors, so many excuses.



1. No, lancers don't do more PvP damage than a defensive stance warrior in PvP. Stop exaggerating.

2. Defensive stance just got a rank 3 and gives you even more endurance. The 1% more taken is negligible.

3. Watch Ktera arena videos. Most warriors go defensive stance because they can secure kills almost as easily as an assault stance, it just gives them extra security in an uncertain fight. Self-preservation is the most important part of 3v3.



You're seeing these changes through sht-tinted glasses. You forget that there's 3 or 4 balance patches in between the initial 3v3 patch and the one currently released. Defensive stanced warriors were OP, now they're adjusted.



Also, just a note to the warrior who talked about the NT bosses. I always take armadillo when I 3/4man NT. I always kill it just as fast as the other people in the group, even if there's a lancer on the other boss. Just because you're a garbage warrior doesn't mean the rest of us are.

How about you guys wait for the patch before you freak out? when 3v3 arena first came out a warrior comp was at the top of the ranking......

Quote: tamernator on 02/01/2013, 04:30 AM

Quote: Zdzisiu on 02/01/2013, 03:21 AM

Buff for what? Satance what is not used by anyone? Warrior in assalut stance die much faster than any cloth class. This 5% endurance means nothing here.







Warrior was described as tank class. And only on defensive stance is playable - and it getting next nerf. And assalut stance will stay useless - because warrior is melee character and it can not be glass cannon (or more glass stungun in case of this class). That is nothing more than constant destroy good class in all this nerf parade in 3 patches in a row.

I agree with you.



Look at this from that point of view



Lancers have block + best deffence + stuns (actually better than warriors ones) + damage as got warriors in assault stance



Lancer as a tank has more damage than warrior in tank stance...why ?



Why Lancers deserve to have good dmg and block together while Warrior haves to choose one of them ?



Nonsens

Lancer's mobility is nothing compared to a warriors and no, equally geared lancers cannot do as much damage as we can, its close but its not more or equal to ours. If played at 5 stars, warriors do have more survivability than lancers do if we use our damage reduction abilities at the right time hence the "5 star"

These changes are most likely due to the fact that warriors can stun lock a person until death, a whole load of defense, a consistent flow of damage while repeatedly flinching on opponent all, and reducing attack animations using block all while in def stance. There is also the ability to achieve 10+ second invincibility, which warriors are regularly seen doing with death from above, into roll, into roll, rising fury to gain those extra few secs, into death from above, into roll, etc.

Buff for what? Satance what is not used by anyone? Warrior in assalut stance die much faster than any cloth class. This 5% endurance means nothing here.



Warrior was described as tank class. And only on defensive stance is playable - and it getting next nerf. And assalut stance will stay useless - because warrior is melee character and it can not be glass cannon (or more glass stungun in case of this class). That is nothing more than constant destroy good class in all this nerf parade in 3 patches in a row.

Quote: Spikoli on 01/24/2013, 10:03 AM

Quote: Kaizokuoni on 01/24/2013, 09:57 AM

Quote: Spikoli on 01/24/2013, 08:40 AM

Quote: Hissatsu on 01/24/2013, 08:33 AM

I just want to know what the drop rate will be. I just can't for the life of me be satisfied with EME effectively making enchanting even harder. They have effectively even made a large chunk of you actually feel greatful for being screwed just by putting all the blame on bhs. We don't even know for certain that what they are saying is true.

IT DOES NOT MATTER, what the drop rate is.



Player A and Player B, play exactly the same amount of time. They do the exact same activities. The loot the exact same items.



Player A spends 500 bucks in the Cash Shop on Alk - NEEDED for POWER.

Player B spends 0.



Player A can use all his gold on other items needed for POWER.

Player B needs to manage his resources in a way which player A does not - because player A circumvented this process with a credit card.



Player A has a signifigant advantage. His available balance on his credit card was higher, so he deserves to win according to EME.

So if one of the two only had half the time to play as the other or came to the game late, they are SOL then by your example? since it would be the same uphill battle as the so called credit card arms race you seem to be carrying on about.

Why do people like you keep missing the point?



It has NOTHING TO DO with who has what time to play.



You have to assume, that if people with to be good playing Tera, they are going to invest time into it.



This has to do with average players, playing average identical schedules, being separated in Power by the available balance on their credit cards.



1 player can afford to purchase unlimited items of power needed for advancement, playing 25 hours a week.



1 player cannot afford to spend tons of money - playing the same 25 hours.



The second player is punished in a competitive enviroment because he doesn't make as much RL money?



Get real man.

This has EVERYTHING to do with who has what time to play, The entire argument you've presented relies on equal play time. The bottom line is, MMO's are far from fair, the more time you can invest the more power you are able to aquire.